B2 responce to Amsterdam2 mindmap on Creation

The creator's identity is formed by culture. The notion of a sharing culture between creator and spectator shouldn't be taken for grunted in today's age of reproduction, frequent interactions within globalised societies and diversity in contemporary Metropoles' population. This is a procedure of exchange, an interchangeable experience, both a dialectic process and a space of conflict. We found that your reference on identity in the presence of the creator is really significant but isn't the creator also a carrier of culture previously and gradually formed by its role as a spectator? And what about the identity of the product of creation? Isn't it by its turn a factor in culture making process?

This debate involves a lot of exchange and interaction. It's an ongoing process that is apparently depicted on Zarilli's text. He is regularly stating the significance of the audience's demand in perfromance evolution, for example, how audience's expectations for spectacular bodies after the inroduction of photography and its materialist reality before the Great War ifluenced immensely the popular culture from 1850 until 1914.